U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee
Publications Issue List Vote Analysis Main Page
No. 61 June 5, 2000
S. 2549 -- National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2001

Calendar No. 543

Reported as an original bill from the Senate Armed Services Committee on May 12, 2000, by a vote of 19-1; Senator McCain voted "no." S. Rept. 106-292, with additional and minority views.


NOTEWORTHY


BACKGROUND

S. 2549 authorizes: appropriations for procurement; research, development, test and evaluation; and operation and maintenance; personnel end strengths for each military active duty component and for each of the reserve components of the armed forces; appropriations for military construction programs; and appropriations for national security programs of the Department of Energy (DoE).

The Committee believes the budget submitted by the Administration was positive in some respects as it: included full funding of the pay raise directed by Congress last year; achieved the procurement goal of $60 billion a year; and included initiatives to improve military health care.

However, a full examination of the President's budget made clear that many shortfalls remained.

Therefore, the Committee, for a second year in a row, reversed the 14-year downward trend in defense spending by approving a defense authorization bill which includes an increase, in real terms, in the U.S. defense budget. The bill authorizes a total of $309.8 billion for defense spending, an increase of $4.5 billion over the budget request, and a real increase of 4.4 percent. Of this increase the Committee authorizes: $63.28 billion in procurement funding ($3 billion over the President's request); $109.2 billion for operations and maintenance (with $1.5 billion added to the primary readiness accounts); and $39.31 billion for research, development, test and evaluation (a $1.45 billion increase over the President's budget.)


HIGHLIGHTS

The Committee addresses several essential defense priorities in this year's bill. Specifically, the Committee:


BILL PROVISIONS

Title I - Procurement

Title II - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

Title III - Operation and Maintenance (O&M)

Title IV - Military Personnel Authorizations

ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTHS

FY2000 FY2001 FY2001

Authorization Request Recommendation

Army 480,000 480,000 480,000

Navy 372,037 372,000 372,000

Marines 172,518 172,600 172,600

Air Force 360,877 357,000 357,000

________ _______ _______

Total 1,385,432 1,381,600 1,381,600

SELECTED RESERVE END STRENGTHS

FY2000 FY2001 FY2001

Authorization Request Recommendation

Army National Guard 350,000 350,000 350,088

Army Reserve 205,000 205,000 205,000

Naval Reserve 90,288 88,900 88,900

Marine Corps Reserve 39,264 39,500 39,558

Air National Guard 106,678 108,000 108,022

Air Force Reserve 73,708 74,300 74,300

Coast Guard Reserve 8,000 8,000 8,500

________ _________ ___________

Totals 872,938 873,700 874,368

Title V - Military Personnel Policy

Title VI - Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits

Title VII - Health Care

  • -Authorizing a comprehensive retail and national mail order pharmacy benefit for all eligible beneficiaries, including Medicare-eligible beneficiaries, with no enrollment fee or deductible.

  • -Extending TRICARE Prime to families of service members assigned to remote locations.
  • -Eliminating co-payments for services received by active duty family members under TRICARE Prime.
  • -Authorizing lifetime health care provided by the Department of Defense to recipients of the Medal of Honor and their families.
  • -Authorizing a chiropractic benefit for those beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime.
  • -Directing the Secretary of Defense to implement a number of programs related to patient safety and error reduction.

Title IX - DoD Organization and Management

Title X - General Provisions

Title XII - Matters Relating to Other Nations

Title XIII - Navy Activities on the Island of Vieques, Puerto Rico

  • If the people of Vieques do not approve the continuation of live-fire training, the bill would:
  • Titles XXI-XXIV - Military Construction: Army, Navy, Air Force, Defense Agencies

    Title XXXI - Department of Energy (DoE) National Security Programs


    COST

    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that appropriation of the authorized amounts for 2000 and 2001 would result in additional outlays of $307 billion over the 2000-2005 period. In addition, the bill contains provisions that would raise the costs of discretionary defense programs over the 2002-2005 period by about $5 billion, assuming appropriation of the necessary sums.

    The bill contains provisions that would increase direct spending by an estimated $2.0 billion over the 2001-2005 period and $2.1 billion over the 2001-2010 period. The bill would reduce revenues by $396 million over the 2001-2005 period and $1.2 billion over the 2001-2010 period as the result of a provision that would allow military personnel to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). Because it would affect direct spending and receipts, the bill would be subject to pay-as-you-go procedures.


    ADMINISTRATION POSITION

    The Statement of Administration Policy was unavailable at press time.


    OTHER VIEWS

    Additional Views of Senators Levin, Robb, Kennedy, Reed, Landrieu, and Bingaman

    These members provide additional views on two issues addressed in the bill: Vieques and Department of Energy Organization.

    Vieques

    The members note with approval that the Committee did not support proposed legislation that "would have been inconsistent" with the agreement between Puerto Rico and the United States regarding the Navy training range on Vieques. They further note that the Committee remained silent on the transfer of various lands to Puerto Rico under certain circumstances. They conclude, "Our preference is to fully implement the agreement between the President and the Governor of Puerto Rico at this time. However, avoiding unilateral changes to the terms of the agreement is the next best outcome."

    Department of Energy Organization

    The Senators argue that two DoE-related provisions in the bill regarding the National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, (prohibiting the DoE from paying any NNSA officials who are "dual-hatted" and prohibiting the Energy Secretary from changing the organization of the NNSA in any way) should be deleted from the bill.

    Additional Views of Senator Bingaman

    The Senator also filed separate additional views in which he states his support for this year's DoD Authorization bill since it "provides the necessary resources to meet the nation's increasingly complex military missions while also supporting quality of life improvements for our men and women in uniform."

    At the same time, Senator Bingaman relates his concern "that the bill does not provide all that could be done to support the most vital national security objectives with respect to non-proliferation and the strategic relationship between the United States and Russia."

    He also reiterates the concern regarding the NNSA stated by himself and Senators Levin, Robb, Kennedy, Reed, and Landrieu, detailed on page 13 of this notice.

    Minority Views of Senator McCain

    The Senator states how on most issues he supports the Committee's recommendations in the drafting of this year's DoD Authorization bill. Yet, he voted against the bill "mostly because of what it does not do." Senator McCain cited his disappointment that "the bill that emerged from the committee failed to address important reform issues."

    In particular, Senator McCain notes his disappointment that this year's bill does not include legislation to provide a Special Subsistence Allowance to help the neediest families in the Armed Forces who now require federal food stamp assistance. And while the Committee did include some key health care provisions, "they failed to meet what I think is the most important requirement, the restoration of this broken promise" of lifetime medical care, especially for those over the age of 65.

    Finally, the Senator reiterates his long-standing criticism that the military "needs less money spent on pork and more money spent wisely to redress the serious problems caused by a decade of declining defense budgets."


    POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS

    Grams. To improve benefits for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces and their dependents.

    Reid/Inouye. To permit members of the Armed Forces who have a service connected disability to receive military retired pay concurrently with veterans' disability compensation.

    Schumer. Regarding Vieques.

    Unknown. To increase full-time manning numbers for the National Guard.

    Unknown. Regarding the implementation of the Strategic Arms Reductions Talks (START) II Treaty.

    Unknown. To require two additional rounds of base closings - one in 2003, the other in 2005, based on the same criteria used for previous rounds of base closings.

    Top Publications Issue List Vote Analysis Main Page