U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee - Larry E. Craig, Chairman - Jade West, Staff Director

No. 67 May 14, 1998

S. 1415 -- The National Tobacco Policy
and Youth Smoking Reduction Act

Calendar No. 353

Report filed and placed on the Calendar May 1, 1998 from the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation with an amendment in the nature of a substitute by a vote of 19-1 (Senator Ashcroft voting no).


NOTEWORTHY
  • As of press time, the current procedural situation is fluid. We anticipate that cloture will be filed on the motion to proceed to S. 1415. A vote on that motion could occur as early as Monday. The Senate Finance Committee was given referral of the bill on May 13 for one day. The Finance Committee must report by 9 p.m. today or the bill will be discharged from the Committee and placed on the Calendar. The Committee is considering proposals to convert tobacco revenues to excise taxes, offset the tax increases with health care related tax cuts, strike and modify the trade provisions, and make modifications to the distribution of the States' share. The Committee is also considering modifying expenditures from the Tobacco Trust Fund.
  • The Commerce Committee, too, is contemplating major changes in its bill. This Legislative Notice is based on the bill reported from the Commerce Committee. RPC will later provide information on changes as further information becomes available.


HIGHLIGHTS


BACKGROUND

The June 20th Agreement

On June 20, 1997, tobacco manufacturers, public health representatives, private plaintiff attorneys and state attorneys general announced that they had reached agreement (hereafter referred to as "Agreement") on a process that could dramatically change the way tobacco is marketed, sold and consumed in the United States. In the Agreement, participating tobacco companies agreed to make large payments -- $368.5 billion over 25 years (in constant 1999 dollars) -- to reimburse states for tobacco-related medical costs and to pay for tobacco control programs to reduce tobacco use among teenagers. In return, the tobacco manufacturers were to receive protection from class action civil liability lawsuits.

The Agreement was a response to the lawsuits filed by 41 states and Puerto Rico against tobacco companies to recover the states' medical costs of treating smoking-related illnesses. To date, four states (Florida, Texas, Mississippi and Minnesota) have reached agreements with the tobacco companies and settled their lawsuits. In addition, the Liggett Group has reached separate agreements with 41 states.

The Agreement reached by the negotiators included a regulatory structure and settlement procedure that requires legislative action. Specifically, the Agreement contemplated new trust funds, programs, commissions, grant programs and committees, and new funding streams for existing programs. For example, the Agreement proposed to: (1) give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wide authority to regulate tobacco products and smoking and to codify existing regulations; (2) mandate that states enact a retail licensing scheme and require them to conduct random, unannounced inspections of retail establishments; (3) create a federal standard directing OSHA to restrict smoking in public facilities; (4) create new programs that might be viewed as entitlements, such as the Tobacco Use Cessation program that would give money to individuals to quit smoking; and (5) require states to have in effect a "no sales to minors" law.

All of these provisions require legislative action, but were agreed to by the tobacco manufacturers, public health officials, plaintiff attorneys, and state attorneys general, without any Congressional participation or input. Since only Congress can write and amend statutes, the Agreement could not take effect without Congressional action.

S. 1415 attempts to legislate the structural framework of the Agreement, but with some significant differences. For example, according to the Commerce Committee's Report, the bill increases industry payments, doubles the penalties the industry would pay for failure to meet youth tobacco reductions, and bolsters FDA authority over nicotine and tobacco products. The bill also modifies the civil liability proposals by imposing only a yearly cap on civil liability and settling only state and local government suits and the Castano class action claims (the Agreement also restricted private class action suits against the industry). [To assist readers, RPC has noted throughout this Notice, for many of the major provisions, whether the language was or was not a part of the Agreement, although these notations are not comprehensive.]

The tobacco manufacturers have since announced that they no longer support the bill. A number of provisions in the bill contemplate the voluntary participation of the tobacco companies, but because they are no longer willing to participate, provisions in the bill now raise a number of constitutional issues. The Judiciary Committee held a hearing on May 13th to discuss the constitutional issues, and the following issues were among those that were raised: A number of scholars and lawyers have argued both before Judiciary and the Commerce Committees that the advertising ban and restrictions violate the First Amendment unless the tobacco companies voluntarily waive their constitutional rights. The look-back provisions are similarly constitutionally questionable, since they may constitute an unconstitutional penalty -- which cannot be imposed without a showing of fault -- unless the companies agree to participate voluntarily. The payments required of the tobacco companies may be an unconstitutional taking under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The licensing fees and the international provisions raise additional constitutional questions. In addition to these possible constitutional questions, the bill raises a number of budgetary issues.

Budgetary Issues

S. 1415 raises a number of budgetary issues and contains many provisions to which the Budget Act would apply -- including new mandatory spending programs, the establishment of new trust funds, and various financial mechanisms within the bill. However, the central budgetary issue of S. 1415 is its intended off-budget status. The Senate Budget Committee has produced a chart ("Informed Budgeteer," 5/11/98) that demonstrates the daunting complexity of S.1415's financing mechanisms.

By taking the NTSTF off-budget, all of the fiscal procedures of normal budget process would be circumvented -- spending caps, Pay-Go offset requirements, budget resolution parameters, as well as all of the relevant enforcement mechanisms such as 60-vote points of order.

While the bill intends to create an off-budget NTSTF, CBO cannot score the bill as off-budget until such language actually becomes law. Thus CBO will score S. 1415 as though it were a normal on-budget entity. Such scoring will result in at least two 60-vote points of order being raised against the bill (for violating the FY 1998 budget resolution's aggregate spending level and for violating the Commerce Committee's allocation of budget authority and outlays).

Finally, the attempt to take the NTSTF off-budget creates additional budget problems. It is itself a violation of the Budget Act (Section 306 of the Budget Act) and will result in 60-vote point of order. Currently, only two entities have off-budget status: Social Security and the Postal Service. Efforts to extend off-budget treatment have consistently been resisted as being bad budget policy because of the removal of fiscal discipline and oversight that such removal entails, as well as undermining the federal budget's purpose of measuring the federal government's total impact on the economy.


BILL PROVISIONS

Sec. 1: Short Title and Table of Contents [Bill, pp. 239-244]
Sec. 2: Findings [Bill, pp. 244-251]
Sec. 3: Purpose [Bill, pp. 251-254]
Sec. 4: Scope and Effect [Bill, pp 254-256]
Sec. 5: Non-preemption of More Restrictive Laws [Bill, pp. 256-257]
Sec. 6: Definitions [Bill, pp 257-263]
Sec. 7: Notification if Youthful Cigarette Smoking Restrictions Increase Youthful Pipe and Cigar Smoking [Bill, p. 263]

Sec. 8: Liability Provisions Disappear if Tobacco Product Manufacturers Challenge Advertising Limits [Bill, pp. 263-264]

Sec. 9: FTC Jurisdiction Not Affected [Bill, p. 264]
Sec. 10: Congressional Review Provisions [Bill, p. 264]


Title I -- Regulation of the Tobacco Industry
Subtitle A -- Jurisdiction of FDA

Sec. 101, Amendment of Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) of 1938: Subtitle A creates a new chapter IX within the FDCA giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) comprehensive statutory authority to regulate tobacco products. The current chapter IX is redesignated as chapter X of the FDCA. The following is a description of the new FDCA sections:

Subtitle B -- Tobacco Advertising


Title II -- Reductions in Underage Tobacco Use
Subtitle A -- Underage Use

Subtitle B -- State Enforcement Incentives

Subtitle C -- Other Programs

[Most of the provisions in this title were contemplated in the June 20th Agreement]


Title III -- Product Warnings and Smoke Constituent Disclosure
Subtitle A -- Product Warnings, Labeling and Packaging

[This advertising ban raises serious constitutional questions since it requires voluntary participation of the tobacco companies.]

Subtitle B -- Testing and Reporting of Tobacco Product Smoke Constituents

[Most of the provisions in this title were contemplated in the June 20th Agreement]


Title IV -- National Tobacco Settlement Trust Fund

[Note: On May 13, unanimous consent was reached to refer the tobacco bill to the Senate Finance Committee for one day. It was anticipated that the Committee on May 14 would substitute excise taxes for payments, and would address spending issues, including Medicaid. For a discussion on the budgetary issues raised by this bill, see Background at the front of this Notice.]

[The payments and look-back penalties were contemplated at lower levels in the June 20th Agreement. However, most of the spending decisions were made in Committee.]


Title V -- Standards to Reduce Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke

[The provisions in this title were contemplated in the June 20th Agreement]


Title VI -- Application to Indian Tribes

[Note that the Commerce Committee stated that this title was still being negotiated and that consensus language was expected to be included in a manager's amendment. See Chairman McCain's Additional Views in the Committee Report re. this title, pps. 73-75. Further, we understand that Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Campbell may offer an amendment to this title.]

[The June 20th Agreement contemplated application to Indian Tribes.]


Title VII -- Civil Liability

[This provision is one of the main differences from the June 20th Agreement.]


Title VIII -- Industry Compliance

[Many of the provisions in this title were contemplated in the June 20th Agreement.]


Title IX -- Disclosure of Tobacco Industry Documents

[This provision raises constitutional issues since it requires tobacco companies to voluntarily participate].

[Many of the provisions in this title were contemplated in the June 20th Agreement.]


Title X -- Long-Term Assistance For Farmers


Title XI -- Miscellaneous
Subtitle A -- "Prohibitions Relating to Tobacco Products and Children"
[Includes Prohibitions on Business Activities in Foreign Countries, New Domestic Spending, and Medicaid Mandates]

[These provisions were not contemplated in the June 20th Agreement.]

Subtitle B -- Federal Licensing of Tobacco Product Distribution

[This provision raises a constitutional issue since the fee applies to cigarettes manufactured for export, in violation of the Export Clause.]

Subtitle C -- International Provisions

[This section raises significant trade issues and is currently being redrafted by the Committee with input from the United States Trade Representative; it is also being examined by the Finance Committee.]

Subtitle D -- Prevention of Tobacco Smuggling

Subtitle E -- Limited Antitrust Exemption

Subtitle F -- Special Provisions Concerning Programs for Women, Minorities, and Others

Subtitle G -- Sense of the Senate

Subtitle H -- Ban on Sale of Tobacco Products Through the Use of Vending Machines


Title XII -- Tobacco Asbestos Trust Fund

[This title was not contemplated in the June 20th Agreement]


Title XIII: Veterans' Benefits

[This title was not contemplated in the June 20th Agreement]


ADMINISTRATION POSITION

Although discussions have been ongoing with the Administration and the Commerce Committee, as of press time, no formal statement of Administration position has been submitted.


COST

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has not yet scored this bill but hopes to have the scoring completed early next week. As the Commerce Committee contemplates further changes in the bill, and with the referral of the bill to the Finance Committee, it is possible that the legislation may come to the floor without a CBO estimate of its cost.


POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS

We will address likely and possible amendments in an Update.


TOP PUBLICATIONS MAIN PAGE