
| No. 42 | October 7, 1997 |
Calendar No. 188
Reported by the Committee on Environment and Public Works on October 1, 1997, with an amendment to change the name of the bill, by a vote of 18 to 0. S. Rept. 105-95.
NOTEWORTHY
- The Majority Leader has indicated his intention to attempt to turn to this bill on Wednesday, October 8, following the 12:00 noon cloture vote on S. 25.
- Senator Kennedy has indicated he will filibuster the motion to proceed to the bill because of his opposition to the allocation provided to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This may result in the Majority Leader filing a cloture motion on the bill.
- Senator McConnell intends to offer an amendment to strike the provision that continues the 10 percent set-aside for minority small businesses under the "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program (sec. 1111). [See Additional Views of Senator Sessions on p. 8].
- The bill authorizes $145 billion over six years, beginning in FY 1998, which is a 20- percent nominal increase over the amount authorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (1991 ISTEA). Among its changes to the 1991 act is the guarantee of a 90-percent return of each State's annual contributions to the Highway account.
- On September 25, 1997, the Senate Banking Committee ordered reported the "Federal Transit Act of 1997," which reauthorizes the Mass Transit title of ISTEA. That bill, and the Finance Committee's bill to extend the Highway Trust Fund excise taxes, ordered reported on October 1, 1997 -- both of which will be offered as floor amendments -- are summarized in the "Possible Amendments" section, at the end of this Notice.
HIGHLIGHTSS. 1173 (referred to as ISTEA II) is a comprehensive six-year measure to reauthorize the Federal-aid highway, highway safety, and other surface transportation programs, providing $145 billion over the six-year period. That amounts to a 20-percent nominal increase (5 percent in real dollars) over the previous authorization, ISTEA I, signed into law by President Bush in 1991. [See Background for details about the goals and contents of 1991 ISTEA.]
- The bill changes the Trust Fund allocation formula (including a guarantee of 90-percent return of each State's annual contributions to the Highway account).
- S. 1173 combines the bridge program into the National Highway System (NHS) and combines the Interstate System into the Surface Transportation Program (STP). The bill also allows up to 50 percent of the Interstate Maintenance account to be used in the STP and NHS accounts. And, it increases flexibility for States and localities by including more than 20 measures to streamline and improve project approval and planning for surface transportation projects.
- The bill increases funding by 18 percent for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and expands eligibility to areas of "carbon dioxide and submarginal ozone nonattainment areas."
- It also authorizes NHS and STP monies to be used for public passenger rail and bus terminals, "intelligent transporation systems," and other projects.
Summary of the State Allocation Changes
The bill replaces the apportionment formulas provided in 1991 ISTEA, which were based on each State's historical share of apportionments received during the period 1987 through 1991. Instead, this bill apportions funds based on current transportation measurements in each State.
Under the bill, each State will receive a minimum of 90 percent of its annual contributions to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund, which is the same percentage as 1991 ISTEA, except that the percentage is based on 100 percent of a State's annual contributions to the Highway Trust Fund, rather than less than 80 percent of the total under 1991 ISTEA. The bill retains the 1 percent set-aside for metropolitan planning (consistent with current law). All factors used in the apportionment formulas are to be based on the latest available data and updated each year. These changes are contained in section 1102, and are explained below.
Interstate and National Highway System(INHS): The component includes the Interstate Maintenance account, the Interstate bridge account and the National Highway System (NHS) account. Each State is guaranteed a minimum of one-half of one percent of total INHS program funding. The apportionment provided in the bill is as follows:
- Interstate Maintenance component: based on a State's share of total Interstate land miles and total Interstate vehicle miles traveled within the State.
- Interstate Bridge component: based on a State's share of total square footage of structurally deficient and functionally obsolete Interstate bridges within the State.
- National Highway System component: based on a State's share of --
- total lane miles of principal arterial routes (excluding Interstate lane miles)
- total vehicle miles traveled on principal arterials (excluding Interstate lane miles)
- total square footage of deficient bridges on principal arterials (excluding Interstate routes);
- diesel fuel use
- total lane miles of principal arterials per capita
Surface Transportation Program (STP) provisions also provide for a one-half of one percent minimum apportionment to each State. The STP funds are calculated as follows:
- total Federal aid highway lane miles
- total vehicle miles traveled on Federal aid highways
- total square footage of deficient bridges on Federal aid highways
- contributions into the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund
Adjustments: In addition, this bill replaces the five apportionment adjustments provided in 1991 ISTEA with two adjustments, the "ISTEA transition" adjustment and the Minimum Guarantee.
ISTEA Transition adjustment:
Minimum Guarantee:
- A maximum allocation: The annual increase in a State's total funding each year may not exceed the percentage (specified in section 1102, e.g. 45 percent in FY1998) over its average 1991 ISTEA funding level.
- A minimum allocation: A State's allocation: 1) may increase by at least the percentages provided in section 1102 (e.g., 7 percent in FY 1998) from its average of 1991 ISTEA funding (minus certain programs); or 2) a State's minimum allocation may be equal to it FY 1997 funds (minus Hold Harmless and demonstration projects).
- Each State is guaranteed at least 90 percent of the total funds that it contributed to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund. This is higher than current law, which only guarantees that a State receive its ratio (90 percent of its contribution times the ratio of approximately 80 percent of the ISTEA funds).
- A special minimum share also applies for the 15 States listed in the table in the new section 105(a)(2) of title 23 (see page 31 of the bill).
Summary of Other Bill Provisions
(These highlights are provided by the Majority Staff of the Committee on Environment and Public Works)
Measures to Maximize Limited Federal Resources:
- To help bridge the gap between substantial infrastructure needs and limited resources, the bill provides new approaches to finance surface transportation.
- The bill refines and codifies the State Infrastructure Bank (SIBs) program.
- It establishes a new financing program that will provide $500 million to leverage a $10.6-billion federal line of credit to support new transportation projects.
- The bill increases funding for intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and other innovative technologies.
Highway Safety Provisions:
- Increases the funding set-aside for safety programs such as hazard elimination and railway-highway crossings to $680 million per year, a 56-percent increase over 1991 ISTEA levels.
- Provides performance-based incentive grants over six years to States that increase their annual seat belt usage rate or that surpass the national average seat belt usage rate.
- Establishes a new program to encourage states to enact laws and minimum penalties that target repeat drunk driving.
- Establishes a new border infrastructure and safety program to address safety concerns that have resulted from NAFTA.
Increases Environmental Provisions:
- To mitigate transportation's impact on air quality, the bill increases funding for the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) improvement program by an average of 18 percent over current levels.
- The bill provides a 25-percent increase in funds set aside for transportation enhancement activities, such as bicycle pedestrian facilities, and historic preservation.
- It establishes a new wetland restoration pilot program to help offset loss or degradation of wetlands resulting from federal-aid transportation projects.
- It increases funding for the popular National Scenic Byways and Recreational Trails programs.
- It makes natural habitat enhancement an eligible expense under the NHS and STP.
Program Streamlining and Flexibility Improvements:
- The bill consolidates five major program categories established in 1991 ISTEA to three categories by incorporating the Bridge program into the NHS, and the Interstate program into the STP.
- The bill expands the eligibility of National Highway System program funds to include Amtrak and other passenger rail terminals, publicly owned bus terminals, intelligent transportation systems, and magnetic levitation transportation systems.
- It expands the eligibility of STP funds to include Amtrak and other publicly owned passenger rail infrastructure and rail cars, ITS capital improvements, and magnetic levitation transportation systems.
- The bill includes more than 20 measures to streamline and improve project approval and planning for surface transportation projects.
Planning and Research:
- The bill preserves the strong metropolitan and statewide planning provisions of ISTEA
- It retains the metropolitan planning set-aside.
- It establishes a new pilot program to integrate transportation planning and community preservation.
- It directs research funds to innovative purposes such as advanced composite materials and multimodal research.
Provisions for Diverse Transportation Needs in the Different Regions:
- The bill maintains a strong Federal Lands highway program, and allows other federal land management agencies to help contribute to federal lands highway projects.
- It creates a new cooperative federal lands program to help the so-called "orphan roads" that provide access to federal lands.
- It continues the value pricing pilot program to manage and minimize traffic in the nation's most congested areas.
BACKGROUND1991 ISTEA
The original ISTEA became law on December 18, 1991. Its three principal goals were intermodalism, flexibility, and efficiency, intended to carry out the larger goal of a productive and effective national transportation system. The national intermodal transportation system established in ISTEA connects all forms of surface transportation in a unified and integrated manner. It includes the National Highway System, which consists of the Interstate System and those principal arterial roads deemed essential for national defense, intermodal transfer facilities, and international commerce and border crossings. It also provides improved access to ports and airports to increase national and global commerce. The 1991 ISTEA also sought to promote efficient movement of passengers and freight, increased productivity growth, reduced air pollution, and reduced traffic congestion.
National Highway System Designation Act of 1995
In 1995, President Clinton signed the National Highway System Designation Act. The NHS consists of the Interstate System and those principal arterial routes that have been deemed essential for interstate and regional commerce and travel, national defense, intermodal transfer facilities and trade. Of these some 161,000 miles of roads, 75 percent are rural roads and 25 percent are urban roads.
ISTEA II
ISTEA II is intended to further develop, improve and maintain the National Highway System. ISTEA II will dedicate about 50 percent of the total annual transportation funds provided in this bill to the maintenance and development of this premier transportation network. This total funding is an increase from 1991 ISTEA in which 40 percent was dedicated to the National Highway System.
According to the Committee Report, ISTEA II continues the transportation policy of the United States "to develop a National Intermodal Transportation System that is economically efficient and environmentally sound, provides the foundation for the Nation to compete in the global economy, and will move people and goods in an energy efficient manner."
COSTBudget Authority
The Committee Report states that a letter from the Congressional Budget Office containing its outlay estimates will be published in the Congressional Record as soon as the letter is received. At the time of publication of this Legislative Notice, no CBO letter has been received by the Committee. The bill provides $145 billion in contract authority over six years, beginning in FY 1988, which is 20 percent higher than the amount authorized in 1991 ISTEA, and stays within the parameters of the budget agreement (P.L. 105-33).
Unfunded Mandates
In addition, the Committee evaluated the bill pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (PL 104-4), and concluded that the bill imposes "no Federal intergovernmental unfunded mandates on State, local or tribal governments. . . or Federal private sector mandates."
Regulatory Impact
Finally, the Committee states that the regulatory impact of the bill "is expected to be minimal," noting that the only provision having a "significant" regulatory impact is section 1407. That section ensures that the testing standard for air bags will be based on the simultaneous use of air bags and manual seat belts. The Secretary of Transportation is directed to issue revised standards that are consistent with that section.
OTHER VIEWSSenators Thomas, Sessions, Moynihan, and Lautenberg each filled additional views.
Senator Thomas generally praised the bill as a important first step to bringing an equitable return of tax dollars to Wyoming. He also praised the creation of the Cooperative Federal Lands Program to help Yellowstone and other National Parks meet their roadway repair needs.
Senator Sessions takes exception to the committee report language suggesting that the "Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program," set forth in section 1111 of the bill, would pass the new constitutional test enunciated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 115 S.Ct. 2097 (1995). Senator Sessions observes that the bill "simply reenacts without change the same statutory language that was invalidated in Adarand Constructors." Since "this section is neither supported by a compelling governmental interest, nor [is it] narrowly tailored," he concludes, "I have no doubt but that this section is unconstitutional."
Senator Moynihan endorsed the statement of principles that were set out in the 1991 ISTEA, which were not altered by this bill. He included the 1991 principles verbatim in his Additional Views.
Senator Lautenberg supports a number of provisions in the bill, but indicated his disappointment that it "eliminates the national focus on bridges, does not adequately address infrastructure needs, and unfairly shortchanges certain states." He expressed his disappointment that the bill fails to meet the "basic test of sound policy and fairness" by not using its 20-percent authorization level increase over 1991 ISTEA to ensure that no State would have a cut in transportation funding below its level of the previous year.
ADMINISTRATION POSITIONIn a letter to Committee Chairman John Chafee, dated September 16, 1997, the Secretary of Transportation indicated support for the bill's conformity with the bipartisan balanced budget agreement and the absence of any new demonstration projects. The Secretary also expressed appreciation that "many of the President's priorities were included," and expressed strong objections to any attempt to strike the 10-percent minority small business set asides included in the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. [See Possible Amendments.] However, the Secretary also discussed the Administration's 13 concerns over various provisions in the bill, including:
- the prohibition of the application of the Federal prevailing wage to "Federal" projects funded with repayments of loans made from Federal seed capital;
- elimination of the requirement that States enact and enforce primary seatbelt laws;
- the failure of the bill to establish a hiring preference for in-State welfare recipients;
- the change to CMAQ that eliminated the provisions for the State and metropolitan transportation improvement program and project-level fiscal constraint requirements;
- elimination of the requirement that States must convert Federal-aid highway project documents to the metric system;
- elimination of the unbelted testing standard for air bags (which will allow airbags to deploy with less force).
POSSIBLE AMENDMENTSMcConnell -- To bring the bill into compliance with Adarand v. Pena, by striking the Disadvantage Business Enterprise Program (section 1111), and replacing it with an Emerging Small Business Program that "will provide contracting opportunities for all small businesses -- without regard to race, color, national origin, or gender."
Gramm/Byrd -- To provide that the 4.3-cents-per-gallon Clinton gas tax, which was moved from "deficit reduction" to the "Highway Trust Fund" in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (PL 105-33), could be appropriated under ISTEA notwithstanding the budget authority allocation to the Committee on Environment and Public Works under the FY 1998 Budget Resolution.
Kennedy -- To change the State allocation formula.
Mack -- To permit States to "opt out" of the Federal Highway program.
Inhofe -- To allow CMAQ program (section 1123) funds to be used for new highway lane construction that is HOV-1 (Single Occupancy Vehicles).
_______. To place the Highway Trust Fund off-budget.
Banking Committee Amendment -- [On September 25, 1997, the Banking Committee reported out its title to S. 1173, which is the Federal Transit Act of 1997, reauthorizing mass transit programs funded primarily through the Federal Mass Transit Account. The Committee approved a six-year, $35.7 billion reauthorization, which is a 13-percent increase over that portion of the 1991 funding bill. The title was reported by a 17-1 vote.] The bill -- to be offered as a floor amendment --
- retains the current program structure, including the 40-percent funding split for New Starts, 40 percent for fixed guideway modernization, and 20 percent for the bus capital programs.
- retains the current apportionment formulas and set-asides, including the 5.5 percent allocation of formula funds for the rural program.
- expands the eligibility of funding as "capital projects" the following: preventive maintenance, intelligent transportation systems, transit equipment leasing, and joint development activities. The bill also extends the flexibility to use urbanized area formula funding for either operating or capital assistance (currently only available to areas with under 50,000 population) to areas up to 200,000 population. Additionally, funds are provided for Statewide Planning.
- creates a new "clean fuels formula grant program," with an annual funding authorization of $200 million. This voluntary program will assist transit systems in purchasing low emissions buses and related equipment, constructing fueling and garage facilities for alternative-fuel vehicles, and assisting in the utilization of biodiesel fuel.
- authorizes a $100 million per year assistance program to help welfare recipients and other low-income individuals get to and from jobs; 60 percent of the grants must go to projects in large urbanized areas, 20 percent must go to projects in non-urbanized areas, and 20 percent to projects in small urbanized areas. The authorization is for monies from the General Fund (not the Highway Trust Fund) and is subject to a 50/50 State match.
Finance Committee Amendment -- [On October 1, 1997, the Finance Committee reported out by voice vote its title to S. 1173, which extends for six years the existing transportation taxes and tax credits.] This amendment includes the following changes:
- a 10-year extension of the ethanol tax exemption which, instead of expiring in 2000, would phase down from 5.4 cents a gallon to 5.1 cents a gallon by 2005;
- repeal of the $1.25-per-gallon tax on diesel fuel used by trains; and
- an increase in the tax exemption for employer-provided transit passes form $65 a month to $100 per month, beginning in 2003.